Globalization, Nautical Nostalgia and Maritime Identity Politics. A Case Study on Boundary Objects in the Future German Port Museum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612-0496/12127Keywords:
Museum Studies, Material Semiotics, Globalization, Maritime Heritage, Colonial HeritageAbstract
The German Port Museum is scheduled to open in Hamburg in 2020 as one of Germany’s biggest and best funded museum projects at present. Unlike most comparable institutions, the museum is not only supposed to display the historic dimensions of ports and seafaring, but to assess ports as hubs of globalization and thus help the understanding of a globalized world.
This article approaches the Port Museum’s first and central artefact, the historic four-masted barque Peking, as a crucial organizational and epistemic object in the museum’s development process. The Peking is of significant interest to actors from diverging social worlds, allowing them to approach the ship as a starting point for a critical discussion of globalization, as an artefact of nautical nostalgia and as a symbol for Hamburg’s maritime identity at the same time. Relying on the concept of boundary objects by Star and Griesemer, it is argued that due to its interpretive flexibility, the Peking is capable to reconcile these potentially conflicting individual agendas. It allows actors from different communities of practice to cooperate and to bring the Port Museum into being as a suspenseful, yet stable organizational entity.
References
Amenda, Lars. “‘Welthafenstadt’ Und ‘Tor Zur Welt’: Selbstdarstellung Und Wahrnehmung Der Hafenstadt Hamburg 1900-1970”. Deutsches Schiffahrtsarchiv, 29 (2006): 137–58.
Ashworth, G. J., and B. J. Graham. Senses of Place, Senses of Time and Heritage. Edited by G. J. Ashworth and B. J. Graham. Heritage, Culture, and Identity. Aldershot, England ; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2005.
Behörde für Kultur und Medien. “Die Peking Kehrt Zurück Nach Hamburg!,” September 7, 2020. https://www.hamburg.de/pressearchiv-fhh/14286622/historische-viermastbark-peking-kehrt-nach-hamburg-zurueck/.
Behr, Peter, and Jörn Lütjens. Viermastbark PEKING. Historische Kunstruktionszeichnungen, Belegt und Ergänzt mit Aktuellen Fotografien vor & Während der Restaurationsphase 2019/2020, 2020.
Beirat zur Dekolonisierung Hamburgs. “Eckpunktepapier Für Ein Gesamtstädtisches Dekolonisierendes Erinnerungskonzept,” 2021.
Boieck, Melanie. “Heia Safari’ in Der Hafen-City - (Post-) Koloniales Erinnerungsbewusstsein in Hamburg”. Universität Hamburg, 2018.
Burmester, Heinz. “Die Deutsche Seglerflotte in und nach dem Krieg 1914-1918”. Deutsches Schiffahrtsarchiv 15 (1992): 105–22.
Campling, Liam, and Alejandro Colás. “Capitalism and the Sea: Sovereignty, Territory and Appropriation in the Global Ocean”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36, no. 4 (August 2018): 776–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817737319.
Clark, Brett, and John Bellamy Foster. “Ecological Imperialism and the Global Metabolic Rift: Unequal Exchange and the Guano/Nitrates Trade”. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50, no. 3–4 (June 2009): 311–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715209105144.
Ducruet, César. “The Port City in Multidisciplinary Analysis”. In The Port City of the XXIst Century. New Challenges in the Relationship between Port and City, edited by RETE, 32–48. Venecia: RETE, 2011.
Freunde der Viermastbark Peking e.V. “Zukünftige Nutzung & Hafenmuseum”. Accessed November 30, 2020. https://peking-freunde.de/index.php/die-peking/zukunft.
Gondesen, Andreas. Die letzten Flying P-Liner: PAMIR, PASSAT, ihre Schwestern und Halbschwestern der Baujahre 1902 - 1926. 2. durchgesehene Auflage. Schriften des Deutschen Schiffahrtsmuseums, Band 69. Bremerhaven: Deutsches Schiffahrtsmuseum, 2014.
Gretzschel, Matthias. “Für 120 Millionen Euro: Hamburg Bekommt Neues Hafenmuseum”. Hamburger Abendblatt, November 13, 2015.
———. Peking – Schicksal und Wiedergeburt eines legendären Hamburger Segelschiffes, 2020.
Hein, Carola, ed. Port Cities: Dynamic Landscapes and Global Networks. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge, 2011.
Hein, Carola, and Dirk Schubert. “Resilience, Disaster, and Rebuilding in Modern Port Cities”. Journal of Urban History, 2020, 009614422092509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220925097.
Hetherington, Kevin. “Museum Topology and the Will To Connect”. Journal of Material Culture 2, no. 2 (1997): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/135918359700200203.
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. London: Routledge, 1992. http://site.ebrary.com/id/10060851. Johnson, Irving. Around Cape Horn, 1929.
Kahrs, Johannes. “Bitte Kurs Halten! Warum das Deutsche Hafenmuseum Eine Gewaltige Chance Ist. Eine Erwiderung”. Die Zeit 8/2017 (2017).
Kermani, Azadeh Arjomand, Wout van der Toorn Vrijthoff, and Arash Salek. “The Impact of Planning Reform on Water-Related Heritage Values and on Recalling Collective Maritime Identity of Port Cities: The Case of Rotterdam”. In Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage, edited by Carola Hein, 344–61. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8_18.
Kirchhecker, Angelika. “Viele Hamburger Wollen die ‘Peking’ Retten”. Hamburger Abendblatt, September 11, 1974. https://www.abendblatt.de/archiv/1974/article205134969/Viele-Hamburger-wollen-die-Peking-retten. html.
Klingbeil, Peter, and Hermann Piening. Die Flying P-Liner: die Segelschiffe der Reederei F. Laeisz. Bremerhaven: Deutsches Schiffahrtsmuseum, 1998.
Krukow, Peter. “Die ‚Peking‘ Gehört an Die Elbe”. Hamburger Abendblatt, September 10, 1974.
Latour, Bruno. “‘What’s the Story’? Organizing as a Mode of Existence”. In Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action, edited by Jan-Hendrik Passoth, Birgit Maria Peuker, and Michael W. J. Schillmeier. Routledge Advances in Sociology 58. London ; New York: Routledge, 2012.
Leffler, Phyllis K. “Maritime Museums and Transatlantic Slavery: A Study in British and American Identity”. Journal of Transatlantic Studies 4, no. 1 (March 2006): 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794010608656840.
Mah, Alice. Port Cities and Global Legacies: Urban Identity, Waterfront Work, and Radicalism. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
McLean, Fiona. “Museums and the Representation of Identity”. In The Ashgate Research Companion to Heritage and Identity, edited by B. J. Graham and Peter Howard, 283–96. Ashgate Research Companions. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Pub. Co, 2008.
Mittelacher, Bettina. “Hamburger Windjammer ‘Peking’ Kommt Nach Hause,” December 27, 2015. https://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/article206863305/Hamburger-Windjammer-Peking-kommt-nach- Hause.html.
Monteón, Michael. Chile in the Nitrate Era: The Evolution of Economic Dependence, 1880-1930. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982.
Ostow, Robin. “The Museum as a Model for a Human Rights-Based Future: The International Slavery Museum, Liverpool, UK”. Journal of Human Rights Practice 12, no. 3 (February 25, 2021): 620–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huaa051.
Poria, Yaniv, Richard Butler, and David Airey. “The Core of Heritage Tourism”. Annals of Tourism Research 30, no. 1 (January 2003): 238–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00064-6.
SHMH. “German Port Museum”. Accessed November 27, 2020. https://shmh.de/en/german-port-museum.
Small, Stephen. “Slavery, Colonialism and Museums Representations in Great Britain: Old and New Circuits of Migration”. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 4, no. IX (2011): 117–27.
Smith, Laurajane. “Uses of Heritage”. Abington/New York: Routledge, 2006.
Star, Susan Leigh. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept”. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35, no. 5 (September 2010): 601–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.
Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. “Institutional Ecology, `Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39”. Social Studies of Science 19, no. 3 (August 1989): 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.
Steinberg, Philip E. The Social Construction of the Ocean. Cambridge Studies in International Relations 78. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Stiftung Hamburg Maritim. “Ziele”. Accessed December 1, 2020. https://stiftung-hamburg-maritim.de/ueber-uns/ziele.html.
Strupp, Christoph. “Im Bann des Authentischen? Historische Schiffe und Maritime Museen in Hamburg”. Edited by Forschungsstelle für Zeitgeschichte in Hamburg. Zeitgeschichte in Hamburg – Nachrichten Aus Der Forschungsstelle Für Zeitgeschichte in Hamburg (FZH) 2019 (2020).
Tiedemann, Alex. “Viermastbark ‘Peking’ vor der Heimkehr Nach Hamburg,” December 20, 2012. https://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/article112138645/Viermaster-Peking-vor-der-Heimkehr-nach-Hamburg.html.
Trompette, Pascale, and Dominique Vinck. “Revisiting the notion of Boundary Object”. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances 3, 1, no. 1 (2009): 3. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.006.0003.
Turnbull, David. “Reframing Science and Other Local Knowledge Traditions”. Futures 29, no. 6 (August 1997): 551–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(97)00030-X.
Ulrich, Friederik, Julian Schmelmer, and Lukas Homrich. “Willkommen Zu Hause! Die ‘Peking’ Hat in Hamburg Festgemacht”. Hamburger Abendblatt (blog), September 7, 2020. https://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/article230347454/Die-Peking-kehrt-heim-die-Ueberfahrt-im- Livestream.html.
Wisniak, Jaime, and Ingrid Garcés. “The Rise and Fall of the Salitre (Sodium Nitrate) Industry”. Indian Journal for Chemical Technology 8 (2001): 427–38.
Wolfe-Robinson, Maya. “Slavery Museum to Be Expanded in 10-Year Liverpool Waterfront Project”. The Guardian, January 28, 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/28/slavery-museum-to-be-expanded-in-10-year-liverpool-waterfront-project.
Wu, Zongjie, and Song Hou. “Heritage and Discourse”. In The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, edited by Emma Waterton and Steve Watson, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Melcher Ruhkopf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
