A Creative Approach to the Port-City Relationship: The Case of Zones Portuaires in Genoa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612-0496/12129Keywords:
Port, Research In Action, Festival, Face recognitionAbstract
One of the goals of 2030 AIVP Agenda is to strengthen port-city relationship by “promoting and capitalising on the specific culture and identity of port cities and allowing residents to develop a sense of pride and flourish as part of a city port community of interest” (6th goal). In order to do that, AIVP suggests to encourage the creation of Port Centres, to provide, by any means, daily news and information on port and city life for residents, particularly young people and school students and to organise temporary or permanent cultural events in port areas. This paper aims at presenting the Zones Portuaires Genoa experience as a device which since 2015 has experimented new methods for attending these objectives. The text will critically observe some projects that have been carried on within this process and will place them in the framework of a “research in action” approach.
References
Corradini, Simona. “Temporary Uses as Catalyst for Waterfront Revitalization.” Portus Plus 2 (2011).
Decandia, Lidia. “Towards a Polyphonic Urban Score.” City, Territory and Architecture 1, no. 1 (December 2014): 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40410-014-0012-3.
Deleuze, Gilles. “Qu’est-Ce Qu’un Dispositif?” Paris: Le Seuil, 1988.
Foucault, Michel, Daniel Defert, François Ewald, and Jacques Lagrange. Dits et écrits, 1954-1988., 2017.
Giorgi, Alberta, Micol Pizzolati, and Elena Vacchelli. Metodi creativi per la ricerca sociale: contesto, pratiche, strumenti. Bologna: Il mulino, 2021.
Girel, Sylvia. “1981-2011, Les Dispositifs En Faveur de l’art Contemporain: Entre Logique de Démocratisation et Processus de" Festivisation" Accès Différentiel et Expériences Plurielles Pour Les Publics, Vers Une Reconfiguration Des Pratiques Dites" Culturelles",” 2014. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01108853/document.
Grimshaw, Anna, and Amanda Ravetz. “The Ethnographic Turn - and after: A Critical Approach towards the Realignment of Art and Anthropology.” Social Anthropology 23, no. 4 (November 2015): 418–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12218.
Grenni S., Horlings, L. G., e Soini K. “Linking spatial planning and place branding strategies through cultural narratives in places”. European Planning Studies, 1-20 (2020). Doi: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1701292
Guala, Chito. “Per una tipologia dei mega-eventi.” Bollettino della Società geografica italiana 7 (2002).
Herzfeld, Michael. Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics and the Real Life of States, Societies and Institutions. New York: Routledge, 2016.
———. The Body Impolitic: Artisans and Artifice in the Global Hierarchy of Value. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
Hillmann, Felicitas. “Big Ships on the Horizon and Growing Fragmentation at Home. Genoa’s Transformation of the Urban Landscape.” ERDKUNDE 62, no. 4 (December 1, 2008): 301–16. https://doi.org/10.3112/erdkunde.2008.04.03.
Ingold, Tim. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. 1st ed. Routledge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055.
JR. My Wish: Use Art to Turn the World inside Out, 1299202320. https://www.ted.com/talks/jr_my_wish_use_art_to_turn_the_world_inside_out.
Knowles J. & A. Cole, Arts-informed Research. In L.M.Given (ed) , The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, Sage (2008): 32-35.
Larkin, Brian. “The Politics and Poetics of Infrastructure.” Annual Review of Anthropology 42, no. 1 (October 21, 2013): 327–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092412-155522.
Lenclud, Gérard. “La Tradition n’est plus Ce Qu’elle Était.... Sur Les Notions de Tradition et de Société Traditionnelle En Ethnologie.” Terrain. Anthropologie & Sciences Humaines, no. 9 (1987): 110–23.
Lupi, Patrizia. “Ti porto in porto. Best practices, culturali e didattiche, nei porti italiani,” Portus Plus, 11 (2011): 17.
Marcus, George. “The Green Room, Off-Stage: In Site-Specific Performance Art and: Ethnographic Encounters.” Les Actes de Colloques Du Musée Du Quai Branly, no. 2 (November 13, 2009). https://doi.org/10.4000/actesbranly.453.
Olivier de Sardan, Jean-Pierre. (2000) “Le « je » méthodologique. Implication et explicitation dans l'enquête de terrain” in Revue française de sociologie (2000), 41-3, pp. 417-445
Pagés Sánchez, José M., and Tom A. Daamen. “Using Heritage to Develop Sustainable Port–City Relationships: Lisbon’s Shift from Object-Based to Landscape Approaches.” In Adaptive Strategies for Water Heritage, edited by Carola Hein, 382–99. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00268-8_20.
Palmer, Joni M. “The Resonances of Public Art: Thoughts on the Notion of Co-Productive Acts and Public Art: Resonances of Public Art.” City & Society 30, no. 1 (April 2018): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12154.
Pioselli, Alessandra. “Comunità Contemporanee è un progetto per scoprire la ricerca artistica in connessione con i territori.” cheFare (blog), 2020. https://www.che-fare.com/comunita-contemporanee-la-ricerca-artistica-in-connessione-con-i-territori/.
Quaini, Massimo. Liguria: porta europea del Mediterraneo. Genova: SAGEP, 1998.
Taylor, Charles. The Politics of Recognition. Princeton University Press, 1994.
Tonizzi, Elisabetta M. “Il porto di Genova: 1861-1970.” MEMORIA E RICERCA, no. 11 (2002).
Tonizzi, Maria Elisabetta, Genova. Unità Organizzativa Statistica, and ISTAT. I Numeri e La Storia Del Porto Di Genova. Unità Organizzativa Statistica, 2004.
Warsewa, Günter. “The Role of Local Culture in the Transformation of the Port-City.” Portus 23 (2012): 1–13.
———. The Transformation of European Port Cities: Final Report on the New EPOC Port City Audit. IAW Forschungsbericht, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Maria Elena Buslacchi, Maria Pina Usai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
