A Sense of Place Through Land Art
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612-0496/17583Keywords:
Place, Place making, Sense of place, Ownership of place, Urban health, Land artAbstract
This article investigates the potential of land art as a transformative tool for promoting inclusivity and fostering a sense of belonging in public spaces. Drawing on environmental psychology and participatory urban research, the study explores the cognitive and emotional processes involved in place-making and space (re)appropriation. By examining the artist’s perspective on land art interventions, the paper seeks to understand how these creative practices can re-signify and create place meaning, empowering individuals to become active “placemakers.” The research explore the ways in which land art can enhance awareness of place, foster a sense of agency, and contribute to the creation of more inclusive and socially vibrant urban environments. We are inspired by the Land art movement that emerged in the 1960s, specifically inspired by Europeans’ ephemeral interventions in-and-within the landscape, returnable, with natural materials. In order to explore such possibilities, we focus on land art as a possibility to be used in natural public spaces. These reflections come from teachers and students, all authors of this article, deriving from a project of land art as a part of an international distance master course in environmental psychology, repeated for 3 years. We explore how the creative process of doing a land art project with natural materials from a basic experiential perception of the art-processes unfolds within a public space in different parts of the world, exploring aspects that facilitate or impede such potentials of place creation and awareness of place. Reflections on experiences of creating land art projects are presented exploring the basic perception of inner processes connected to place that are cognitive, somatic and embodied, moving towards a deeper relationship with place, touching upon place meaning, identity and attachment. The findings highlight the potential of individual land art experiences as means of engaging with and reimagining public spaces, raising questions about the rights to the city and the public space, and highlighting the awareness that a land art project that is ephemeral and natural has an intrinsic value for its users and how this could be beneficial for the individual experiences and wellbeing.
References
Adams, Jennifer D., David A. Greenwood, Mitchell Thomashow, and Alex Russ. “Sense of Place.” In Urban Environmental Education Review, edited by Alex Russ and Marianne E. Krasny, 68-75: Cornell University Press, 2017.
Aurigi, Alessandro, and Nancy Odendaal. “From “Smart in the Box” to “Smart in the City”: Rethinking the Socially Sustainable Smart City in Context.” Journal of Urban Technology 28, no. 1-2 (2021): 55-70.
Bartos, Ann E. “Children Sensing Place.” Emotion, Space and Society 9 (2013): 89-98.
Beer, Tanja, Lanxing Fu, and Cristina Hernández-Santín. “Scenographer as Placemaker: Co-Creating Communities through the Living Stage Nyc.” Theatre and Performance Design 4, no. 4 (2018): 342-63.
Bengtsson, Anna, and Patrik Grahn. “Outdoor Environments in Healthcare Settings: A Quality Evaluation Tool for Use in Designing Healthcare Gardens.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13, no. 4 (2014): 878-91.
Bonaiuto, Marino, Susana Alves, Stefano De Dominicis, and Irene Petruccelli. “Place Attachment and Natural Hazard Risk: Research Review and Agenda.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 48 (2016): 33-53.
Brady, Emily. “Aesthetic Regard for Nature in Environmental and Land Art.” Ethics, Place & Environment 10, no. 3 (2007): 287-300.
Bratman, Gregory N., Christopher B. Anderson, Marc G. Berman, Bobby Cochran, Sjerp de Vries, Jon Flanders, Carl Folke, et al. “Nature and Mental Health: An Ecosystem Service Perspective.” Science Advances 5, no. 7 (2019): eaax0903.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2 (2006): 77-101.
Casey, Edward S. “How to Get from Space to Place in a Fairly Short Stretch of Time: Phenomenological Prolegomena.” Senses of place 27 (1996): 14-51.
Cenggz, Canan, and Pelin KeÇeCgoĞlu DaĞli. “Land Art within the Context of Landscape and Art “ In INTERNATİONAL EUROASİA Congress on Scientific Researches and Recent Trends-V. Azerbaijan, 2019.
Certeau, Michel de. “The Practice of Everyday Life.” Berkeley: CA: University of California Press, 1984.
Cross, Jennifer Eileen. “Processes of Place Attachment: An Interactional Framework.” Symbolic interaction 38, no. 4 (2015): 493-520.
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly, and Mihaly Csikzentmihaly. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Vol. 1990: Harper & Row New York, 1990.
Devine-Wright, Patrick, Laís Pinto de Carvalho, Andrés Di Masso, Maria Lewicka, Lynne Manzo, and Daniel R. Williams. ““Re-Placed” - Reconsidering Relationships with Place and Lessons from a Pandemic.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 72 (2020/12/01/ 2020): 101514.
Donald, Merlin. “Art and Cognitive Evolution.” The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity 1 (2006): 3-20.
Fabian, Louise, and Kristine Samson. “Claiming Participation–a Comparative Analysis of Diy Urbanism in Denmark.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 9, no. 2 (2016): 166-84.
Gagnier, Regenia. The Insatiability of Human Wants: Economics and Aesthetics in Market Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Giorgi, Amedeo. “An Application of Phenomenological Method in Psychology.” Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology 2 (1975): 82-103.
Hartig, Terry. “Restoration in Nature: Beyond the Conventional Narrative.” 89-151: Springer International Publishing, 2021.
Hartig, Terry, Marlis Mang, and Gary W Evans. “Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences.” Environment and behavior 23, no. 1 (1991): 3-26.
Hartig, Terry, Richard Mitchell, Sjerp De Vries, and Howard Frumkin. “Nature and Health.” Annual review of public health 35 (2014): 207-28.
Hycner, Richard H. “Some Guidelines for the Phenomenological Analysis of Interview Data.” Human studies 8, no. 3 (1985): 279-303.
Ingold, Tim. “Against Space: Place, Movement, Knowledge.” Boundless worlds: An anthropological approach to movement (2009): 29-43.
—. Being Alive : Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. Abingdon, Oxon ;: Routledge, 2011.
—. The Life of Lines. Abingdon, Oxon ;: Routledge, 2015.
Kaplan, Rachel, and Stephen Kaplan. The Experience of Nature : A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Pr., 1989.
—. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. CUP Archive, 1989.
Knez, Igor, Åsa Ode Sang, Bengt Gunnarsson, and Marcus Hedblom. “Wellbeing in Urban Greenery: The Role of Naturalness and Place Identity.” Frontiers in Psychology (2018).
Korpela, Kalevi, Marketta Kyttä, and Terry Hartig. “Restorative Experience, Self-Regulation, and Children’s Place Preferences.” Journal of environmental psychology 22, no. 4 (2002): 387-98.
Korpela, Kalevi M, Matti Ylén, Liisa Tyrväinen, and Harri Silvennoinen. “Stability of Self-Reported Favourite Places and Place Attachment over a 10-Month Period.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, no. 1 (2009): 95-100.
Korpela, Kalevi Mikael. “Place-Identity as a Product of Environmental Self-Regulation.” Journal of Environmental psychology 9, no. 3 (1989): 241-56.
Lavrinec, Jekaterina. “Urban Scenography: Emotional and Bodily Experience.” Limes: Borderland Studies 6, no. 1 (2013): 21-31.
Lewicka, Maria. “Place Attachment: How Far Have We Come in the Last 40 Years?”. Journal of environmental psychology 31, no. 3 (2011): 207-30.
Liang, Danni, Martin De Jong, Daan Schraven, and Lili Wang. “Mapping Key Features and Dimensions of the Inclusive City: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis and Literature Study.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 29, no. 1 (2022/01/02 2022): 60-79.
Lindelöw, David. “Walking as a Transport Mode: Examining the Role of Preconditions, Planning Aspects and Personal Traits for the Urban Pedestrian.” (2016).
Madrazo, Leandro, Tadeja Zupancic, Burak Pak, and Maria Irene Aparício. “Creating a Network of Places with Participatory Actions across Cities and Cultures.” The Journal of Public Space (2022).
Manzo, Lynne C. “For Better or Worse: Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Place Meaning.” Journal of environmental psychology 25, no. 1 (2005): 67-86.
Manzo, Lynne C, and Patrick Devine Wright. Place attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications. New York: Routledge (2013)
Marcheschi, Elizabeth, Agneta Ståhl, Mai Almén, and Maria Johansson. “A Theoretical Model for Urban Walking among People with Disabilities.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020): 156.
Marcheschi, Elizabeth, Nina Vogel, Anders Larsson, Sonja Perander, and Till Koglin. “Residents’ Acceptance Towards Car-Free Street Experiments: Focus on Perceived Quality of Life and Neighborhood Attachment.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 14 (2022/06/01/ 2022): 100585.
Moula, Zoe, Karen Palmer, and Nicola Walshe. “A Systematic Review of Arts-Based Interventions Delivered to Children and Young People in Nature or Outdoor Spaces: Impact on Nature Connectedness, Health and Wellbeing.” Frontiers in Psychology (2022).
Nations, United. “Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development : A/Res/70/1.” New York: United Nations, 2015.
Plambech, Trine, and Cecil C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch. “The Impact of Nature on Creativity – a Study among Danish Creative Professionals.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14, no. 2 (2015/01/01/ 2015): 255-63.
Ratcliffe, Eleanor, Birgitta Gatersleben, Paul T Sowden, and Kalevi M Korpela. “Understanding the Perceived Benefits of Nature for Creativity.” The Journal of creative behavior 56, no. 2 (2022): 215-31.
Redaelli, Eleonora. “Creative Placemaking and Theories of Art: Analyzing a Place-Based Nea Policy in Portland, Or.” Cities 72 (2018): 403-10.
Ross, Stephanie. What Gardens Mean. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Ruggeri, Deni. “The Agency of Place Attachment in the Contemporary Co-Production of Community Landscapes.” In Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Application, edited by Lynne Manzo
Devine-Wright, Patrick; Laís Pinto de Carvalho, Andrés Di Masso, Maria Lewicka, Lynne Manzo, Daniel R. Williams, “Re-placed” - Reconsidering relationships with place and lessons from a pandemic” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, (2020)
Scannell, Leila, and Robert Gifford. “Comparing the Theories of Interpersonal and Place Attachment.” Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods, and applications (2014): 23-36.
—. “Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework.” Journal of environmental psychology 30, no. 1 (2010): 1-10.
—. “Place Attachment Enhances Psychological Need Satisfaction.” Environment and Behavior 49, no. 4 (2017): 359-89.
Schreiber, Franziska, and Alexander Carius. “The Inclusive City: Urban Planning for Diversity and Social Cohesion.” In State of the World: Can a City Be Sustainable?, edited by Worldwatch Institute, 123-41: Worldwatch Institute, 2016.
Seamon, David. Phenomenological Perspectives on Place, Lifeworlds, and Lived Emplacement: The Selected Writings of David Seamon. New York: Routledge, 2023.
—. “Place Attachment and Phenomenology.” Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications (2013): 12-22.
Shapiro, Roberta, and Nathalie Heinich. “When Is Artification?”. Contemporary Aesthetics (Journal Archive), no. 4 (2012): 9.
Sharp, Joanne, Venda Louise Pollock, and Ronan Paddison. “Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration.” Urban Studies (2005).
Silva, Paulo. “Tactical Urbanism: Towards an Evolutionary Cities’ Approach?”. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design (2016).
Thompson, Catharine Ward, and Penny Travlou. Open Space: People Space. Taylor & Francis, 2007.
Tufnell, Ben. In Land: Writings around Land Art and Its Legacies. California: John Hunt Publishing, 2019.
Twigger-Ross, Clare L, and David L Uzzell. “Place and Identity Processes.” Journal of environmental psychology 16, no. 3 (1996): 205-20.
Verhoeff, Nanna, and Sigrid Merx. “Mobilizing Inter-Mediacies: Reflections on Urban Scenographies in (Post-) Lockdown Cities.” Mediapolis: A Journal of Cities and Culture 5, no. 3 (2020).
Williams, Kathryn JH, Kate E Lee, Terry Hartig, Leisa D Sargent, Nicholas SG Williams, and Katherine A Johnson. “Conceptualising Creativity Benefits of Nature Experience: Attention Restoration and Mind Wandering as Complementary Processes.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 59 (2018): 36-45.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
