Collaboration at New Places of Production: a European View on Procedural Policy Making for Maker Spaces

Bastian Lange; Steve Harding; Tom Cahill-Jones

doi:10.6092/issn.2612-0496/9556

Authors

Bastian Lange University of Leipzig http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-900X

Bastian Lange, Dr. phil., private lecturer at the University of Leipzig. He taught as guest professor (2011-2012) at Humboldt University Berlin (2011-2012) and University of Vechta (2018-2019). In 2008 he founded the independent research and consultancy office Multiplicities in Berlin. For 13 years Multiplicities has been supporting politics, business and creative scenes in the European context on ways to sustainable urban regions. Multiplicities advises municipalities, cities, federal states and EU programmes on the development of innovative places with collaborative participation processes.
Steve Harding Birmingham City University
Harding, Steve, Dr., is the Coordinator of Birmingham City University’s STEAM Fellows Programme working with academics towards the opening of a new interdisciplinary campus focussing on how the Arts can add critical insights to the analytical approaches of STEM. He has been active in many transnational projects focussing on creative cities and economic development, skills for business and enterprise, cross innovation for new combinations of SMEs and most recently in how maker spaces can help catalyse innovation in city eco systems. Steve led the writing team setting out the European Structural and Investment Fund strategy for the Birmingham city region for 2014/20. He has recently completed a Study Visit to California to further develop the University’s position in STEAM thinking and practice. Steve chairs the Initiative for Social Enterprise in Birmingham and the Community Development Trust in Moseley, which hosts The Exchange coworking space.
Tom Cahill-Jones Birmingham City University
Cahill-Jones, Tom, PhD. Tom is an experienced Director/Manager with a demonstrable history of working in the creative and higher education sectors. Skilled in Innovation Development, Policy Development, Operations Management and Performing Arts. His research skills range from a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Electroacoustic Music Composition from The University of Birmingham to a professional interest in makerspaces.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2612-0496/9556

Keywords:

policy clinic, translocal, policy making, collaboration

Abstract

The paper sheds light on a university-led cross-innovation approach where the focus is on so-called “Makers” as a distinctive local group. We introduce the format of a policy clinic—comparable to policy innovation labs—as a method to bring different stakeholders from various local contexts under a given thematic topic temporarily together to learn how to initiate new policies for maker spaces. The key thematic interest is to focus on city challenges and approaching so-called “wicked problems.” This requires wide stakeholder engagement by others not present at the event of the policy clinic. The clinic is a temporary trans-local event but is framed by wider participation involvement that starts earlier and is accompanied by a number of approaches before the Policy Clinic event takes place. The paper sheds light on a university-led cross-innovation approach where the focus is on so-called "Makers" as a distinctive local group. We introduce the format of a policy clinic—comparable to policy innovation labs—as a method to bring different stakeholders from various local contexts under a given thematic topic temporarily together to learn how to initiate new policies for maker spaces. The key thematic interest is to focus on city challenges and approaching so-called “wicked problems.” This requires wide stakeholder engagement by others not present at the event of the policy clinic. The clinic is a temporary trans-local event but is framed by wider participation involvement that starts earlier and is accompanied by a number of approaches before the Policy Clinic event takes place.

References

Anderson, Chris. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Random House, 2012.

Argyris, Chris. Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1996.

Bender, Gerd. “mode 2— Wissenserzeugung in globalen Netzwerken?” In Stadtregion und Wissen: Analysen und Plädoyers für eine wissensbasierte Stadtpolitik, edited by Ulf Matthiesen, 149–157. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11481-9_9.

Bretschneider, Markus, and Ekkehardt Nuissl. “‘Lernende Region’ Aus Sicht Der Erwachsenenbildung.” In Lernende Region-–Mythos Oder Lebendige Praxis, edited by Ulf Matthiesen and Gerhard Reutter, 35–55. Bielefeld: Bertelsmann Verlag, 2003.

Bridge, Gavin, Stefan Bouzarovski, Michael Bradshaw, and Nick Eyre. “Geographies of Energy Transition: Space, Place and the Low-Carbon Economy.” Energy Policy 53 (February 1, 2013): 331–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066.

Budge, Kylie. “Making in the City: Disjunctures between Public Discourse and Urban Policy.” Australian Geographer 50, no. 2 (2018): 185–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2018.1503045.

———. “The Ecosystem of a Makerspace: Human, Material and Place-Based Interrelationships.” Journal of Design, Business & Society 5, no. 1 (March 1, 2019): 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.5.1.77_1.

Chesbrough, Henry William, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West. New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Cooke, Philip, and Dafna Schwartz. Creative Regions: Technology, Culture and Knowledge Entrepreneurship. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.

Cooperrider, David, and Suresh Srivastva. “Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life☆.” edited by Richard W. Woodman and William A. Pasmore, 1:81–142. Research in Organizational Change and Development. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986.

Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations.” Research Policy 29, no. 2 (February 1, 2000): 109–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.

Evans, James, and Andrew Karvonen. “‘Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Lower Your Carbon Footprint!’—Urban Laboratories and the Governance of Low-Carbon Futures.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38, no. 2 (2014): 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12077.

Faulconbridge, James R. “Stretching Tacit Knowledge beyond a Local Fix? Global Spaces of Learning in Advertising Professional Service Firms.” Journal of Economic Geography 6, no. 4 (August 1, 2006): 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbi023.

Fleischmann, Katja, Sabine Hielscher, and Timothy Merritt. “Making Things in Fab Labs: A Case Study on Sustainability and Co-Creation.” Digital Creativity 27, no. 2 (April 2, 2016): 113–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2015.1135809.

Gibbons, Michael. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London & Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1994.

Harloe, Michael, and Beth Perry. “Universities, Localities and Regional Development: The Emergence of the ‘Mode 2’ University?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28, no. 1 (2004): 212–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00512.x.

Healey, Patsy, Stuart Cameron, Simin Davoudi, Stephen Graham, and Ali Madani-Pour, eds. Managing Cities: The New Urban Context. Chichester ; New York: Wiley, 1995.

Heinelt, Hubert, and Daniel Kübler. Metropolitan Governance in the 21st Century: Capacity, Democracy and the Dynamics of Place. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.

Ibert, Oliver. “Relational Distance: Sociocultural and Time–Spatial Tensions in Innovation Practices:” Environment and Planning A, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4247.

Ibert, Oliver, Johanna Hautala, and Jussi S. Jauhiainen. “From Cluster to Process: New Economic Geographic Perspectives on Practices of Knowledge Creation.” Geoforum 65 (October 1, 2015): 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.06.023.

Karvonen, Andrew, and Bas van Heur. “Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38, no. 2 (2014): 379–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12075.

Kostakis, V., and M. Bauwens. Network Society and Future Scenarios for a Collaborative Economy. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137406897.

Lange, Bastian. “Accessing Markets in Creative Industries—Professionalization and Social-Spatial Strategies of Culturepreneurs in Berlin.” Creative Industries Journal 1, no. 2 (January 1, 2009): 115–35. https://doi.org/10.1386/cij.1.2.115_1.

———. “Kreative Interventionen. Innovationswerkstätten als beispielhafte Impulsgeber für Kollaboration in der Peripherie.” In Kreative Pioniere in ländlichen Räumen: Innovation & Transformation zwischen Stadt & Land, edited by Katja Wolter, Daniel Schiller, and Corinna Hesse, 440–464. Stuttgart: Steinbeis-Edition, 2018.

Lange, Bastian, Dominic Power, and Lech Suwala. “Geographies of Field-Configuring Events.” Zeitschrift Für Wirtschaftsgeographie 58, no. 1 (2015): 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2014.0013.

Malecki, Ed, and Gert-Jan Hospers. “Knowledge and the Competitiveness of Places.” In The Learning Region, edited by Roel Rutten and Frans Boekema, 143–159. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847205537.00016.

Markusen, Ann. “Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts.” Economic Geography 72, no. 3 (July 1, 1996): 293–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/144402.

Nevens, Frank, Niki Frantzeskaki, Leen Gorissen, and Derk Loorbach. “Urban Transition Labs: Co-Creating Transformative Action for Sustainable Cities.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Special Issue: Advancing sustainable urban transformation, 50 (July 1, 2013): 111–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001.

Nowotny, Helga, Peter B. Scott, and Michael T. Gibbons. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.

Oldenburg, Ramon, and Dennis Brissett. “The Third Place.” Qualitative Sociology 5, no. 4 (December 1, 1982): 265–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00986754.

Othengrafen, Frank, Luis del Romero Renau, and Ifigeneia Kokkali. “A New Landscape of Urban Social Movements: Reflections on Urban Unrest in Southern European Cities FRANK OTHENGRAFEN, LUíS DEL ROMERO RENAU, AND.” In Cities in Crisis, edited by Jörg Knieling and Frank Othengrafen, 169–184. London and New York: Routledge, 2015.

Roessler, Isabel, Sindy Duong, and Cort-Denis Hachmeister. Welche Missionen Haben Hochschulen?: Third Mission Als Leistung Der Fachhochschulen Für Die Und Mit Der Gesellschaft. Gütersloh: Centrum für Hochschulentwicklung GmbH, 2015. Accessed January 20, 2020, https://www.che.de/wp-content/uploads/upload/CHE_AP_182_Third_Mission_an_Fachhochschulen.pdf.

Schirmer, Jacki. “Scaling up: Assessing Social Impacts at the Macro-Scale.” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31, no. 3 (April 1, 2011): 382–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.12.007.

Schneidewind, Uwe, and Karoline Augenstein. “Three Schools of Transformation Thinking: The Impact of Ideas, Institutions, and Technological Innovation on Transformation Processes.” GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 25, no. 2 (2016): 88-93, https://doi.org/info:doi/10.14512/gaia.25.2.7.

Sennett, Richard. The Craftsman. London: Allen Lane, 2008.

Seravalli, Anna. “While Waiting for the Third Industrial Revolution: Attempts at Commoning Production.” In Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy, edited by Pelle Ehn, Elisabeth N. Nilsson, and Richard Topgaard, 99–129. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2014.

Smith, Adrian, Mariano Fressoli, and Hernán Thomas. “Grassroots Innovation Movements: Challenges and Contributions.” Journal of Cleaner Production, Special Volume: Sustainable Production, Consumption and Livelihoods: Global and Regional Research Perspectives, 63 (January 15, 2014): 114–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025.

Soja, Edward W. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1996.

Toker, Umut, and Denis O. Gray. “Innovation Spaces: Workspace Planning and Innovation in U.S. University Research Centers.” Research Policy 37, no. 2 (March 1, 2008): 309–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.09.006.

Vallance, Paul. “Universities, Public Research, and Evolutionary Economic Geography.” Economic Geography 92, no. 4 (October 1, 2016): 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1146076.

Vathakou, Eugenia. “Citizens’ Solidarity Initiatives in Greece during the Financial Crisis.” In Austerity and the Third Sector in Greece, edited by Jennifer Clarke, Asteris Huliaras, Dimitri A. Sotiropoulos, Asteris Huliaras, and Dimitri A. Sotiropoulos. London and New York: Routledge, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315568348-18.

Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Williamson, Ben. “Governing Methods: Policy Innovation Labs, Design and Data Science in the Digital Governance of Education.” Journal of Educational Administration and History 47, no. 3 (2015): 251–271.

Collaboration at New Places of Production: a European View on Procedural Policy Making for Maker Spaces

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Information

Make a Submission

Keywords

Current Issue